IN ADVANCE CAPITAL

This is a search result page



2011 2nd Quarter Merchant Cash Advance Statistics

August 23, 2011
Article by:

The results are in:


The Merchant Cash Advance industry funded approximately $127,900,000 to small businesses in the 2nd Quarter of 2011.


This is roughly equal to the 1st Quarter, which we originally calculated to be $124,350,000. We’ve since revised it to $129,650,000.

Data trends:

For all previous statistics, visit our MCA Stats Area.

– The Merchant Cash Advance Resource

http://www.merchantcashadvanceresource.com


Deja vu? Merchant Cash Advance in Wall Street Journal

August 10, 2011
Article by:

wall street journalHave you ever had a deja vu moment where you feel like something has happened already even though it hasn’t? And then all of the sudden it happens? Yeah, we just got a little of that. Or maybe we’re just psychic.

It was just a couple months ago that we published a scathing editorial on the failure of the Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) industry to reach mainstream acceptance. (See: The Colossal Marketing Failure of the Merchant Cash Advance Product – June 28th, 2011). Most of our readers acknowledged the shortcomings but were at a loss for suggestions to overcome them. ISO&Agent Magazine quickly added their two cents by claiming that MCA was waiting for its big moment (See: Cash Advances: Negotiating a Maturing Market – July 26th, 2011) but completely missed the mark when they identified cost as the obstacle holding it back. It’s not cost, it’s communication.

How often is MCA cited in mainstream news publications? Wall Street Journal? New York Times?
-direct quote from our piece on June 28th

Today we can say that Merchant Cash Advance got its mention in the Wall Street Journal. :::Applause::: Though it’s only in their blog section, most people today get their news online anyway. The article features AdvanceMe, the largest and oldest player of the bunch. So how does the glorification of one company carry over to the industry as a whole? There were a bunch of good messages in there that describe the product itself: The article title implies it’s becoming more popular: “Cash-Advance Demand Rising” A description of how it works: “Merchant cash advances, which first appeared about a decade ago, provide capital in exchange for a share of future debit or credit-card sales. As such, they tend to be used by retailers, restaurants and other small businesses where a large number of customers pay with cards.”The common uses for it: “Business owners use the cash to buy new equipment, restock inventory or pay off debt” Yes, Yes, and Yes. Good for AdvanceMe and good for the MCA industry but this is only the beginning.

Every business owner should be aware of MCA, not just the ones that read the Journal today. It is Un-American (Yeah, that’s right) to withhold information from business owners that may enable them to capitalize on opportunities. With no bank loans available, most projects in this country are on hold. It’s simply not fair. We badly want to take the credit for today’s Journal mention, especially since we delivered our two previous articles on this topic to their editors in July. But the real hero here is AdvanceMe. Their press release the day before clearly caught the attention of the mainstream media. Great job guys. And we’d be remiss if we didn’t point out they forecasted an increase in funding by $1 billion in the next 2 years. That’s about equal to the industry’s entire volume combined. Is Merchant Cash Advance about to hit its growth spurt? AdvanceMe seems to think so. If they’re about to have their ‘moment‘, they’ll likely pull everyone else along with them.

– AltFinanceDaily
../../

Merchant Hash Advance

July 16, 2011
Article by:

Short on capital? Your business may benefit from a Merchant ‘Hash’ Advance. Restaurants, retail stores, and auto repair shops can easily obtain funding, but medical marijuana dispensaries need love too.

A few cannabis related deals have floated around the Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) industry before, but rarely do they close. At best they elicit a few chuckles from underwriters, who will likely make a few juvenile jokes before turning down a viable, serious, and legal business. The store owners walk away frustrated but neither side is to blame.

In states like New York, where many MCA powerhouses reside, marijuana of any kind is illegal. That makes the sale of it for medicinal purposes in states where it’s legal a foreign concept. We spoke to an underwriter of one Long Island, NY based MCA firm who shared this: “I’ve eaten dinner at a restaurant and I’ve bought flowers from a florist. I understand what makes both businesses tick. I’ve never been to, nor met anyone who has been to a medical marijuana dispensary. I don’t really know what the transaction is like, what risks they face, what their profit margins should be. It’s a big unknown. Is it easy for a dispensary to lose their license and suddenly go out of business? Are there laws that prohibit outside financing? Do we need to keep tabs on where they obtained their inventory from? We typically call a restaurant’s vendors prior to funding to ensure they’re in good standing. I would feel a little weird calling up a weed farm for a reference.”

And he’s not the only one that feels that way. Banks do too. Funding aside, evidence shows cannabis related businesses stuggle to fulfill basic needs such as opening a bank account or accepting credit cards. According to a report by creditcards.com, it’s not uncommon for their checking accounts to be closed without warning, sending the business scrambling for help elsewhere.

But the situation isn’t all grim. We interviewed Nick Emerson, the Managing Director of 420 Card Processing in Campbell, CA (420 CP), a firm that’s changing it all. 420 CP not only provides card acceptance services to medical marijuana dispensaries but can also connect them with access to capital.

Using the concept of MCA, 420 CP and their funding partner will provide actual loans based on credit/debit card processing volume It’s a joint partnership. (Sorry couldn’t resist!). And there’s great news. The typical easy criteria that made traditional MCAs so popular still applies. So long as the license to sell medical marijuana can be proven, dispensary owners have the same odds of being approved as a restaurant would.

So the oportunity is there and the target market is bigger than most people think. According to Nick, “Medical marijuana is legal in sixteen states and DC to the best of our knowledge. Those states are: AK, AR, CA, CO, DC, DE, HI, ME, MI, MT, NV, NJ (still pending), NM, OR, RI, VT and WA. Some of these states are in the throes of evaluating how to implement the ballot measures that were passed and they do not all enjoy the same structures.” But once the ground rules are in place, it’s business as usual. “We have faced no problems as our company is dedicated to providing credit card processing services solely to the medical marijuana industry.  As you can imagine, our clients love us.”

Add that to the ever growing list that the Mechant Cash Advance concept is being applied to.

  • Damaged Credit? Funded!
  • Short Time in Business? Funded!
  • Restaurants? Funded!
  • Retail Stores? Funded!
  • Auto Shops? Funded!
  • Las Vegas Casinos? Funded!
  • E-Bay Stores? Funded!
  • Medical Marijuana Dispensaries? Funded!

Short on capital? If you accept electronic payments, someone somewhere is willing to provide cash against those future sales. No matter what you do…

– The Merchant Hash Advance Resource

../../

###

About 420 Card Processing

420 Card Processing was founded by card processing professionals, with decades of combined experience, who are committed to equal access and opportunity for those involved in all aspects of providing medical marijuana to patients in states that have legalized its use. 420 Card Processing provides services to retailers, wholesalers, suppliers of gardening equipment, and physicians. 420 Card Processing is a member of Americans for Safe Access, California NORML and the National Cannabis Industry Association.

For more information on obtaining a merchant account or funding from 420 Card Processing, contact Nick Emerson:

Sales@420cardprocessing.com

(800) 579-1675900 E. Hamilton Ave.

Suite 100

Campbell, CA 95008

http://420cardprocessing.com

Merchant Cash and Capital Raises the Stakes

July 8, 2011
Article by:

Lately we’ve had an obsession with video marketing in the Merchant Cash Advance space :

New York City based Merchant Cash and Capital raised the stakes yesterday with the release of their new nifty commercial that’s currently available on Youtube. Different from the traditional low budget, stock footage, do it yourself home videos that seem to drag down the value of most mca videos online, this one will definitely keep the viewer engaged. Check it out:


Thumbs up!

Have a unique MCA video? Let us know and we just might share it.

– The Merchant Cash Advance Resource

http://www.merchantcashadvanceresource.com

Yellowstone Capital Has Record Month June 2011

June 30, 2011
Article by:

From what we’ve heard, June was a pretty fabulous month for the Merchant Cash Advance business. How good is fabulous? According to Yellowstone Capital‘s facebook announcement, they did 435 deals for nearly $7 Million. Holy Smokes!

Great work guys! America’s small businesses are fortunate to have a source of capital.

What was your opinion of June? What’s your outlook for 2011? Write to us at webmaster@merchantprocessingresource.com

Industry Leaders Speak Out on Merchant Cash Advance Syndication

June 30, 2011
Article by:

Most ISOs have the option and ability to co-fund deals with the funding sources these days, a topic we discussed back in December in: The Direct Funder Model is SOOOO 2009. That was back when everyone was doing it but no one was talking about it. Now everyones talking about it in the latest micro article by ISO & Agent Magazine, Cash Advances: ISOs Can Earn a Piece of the Action. It discusses syndication with the leaders of the industry’s most prominent firms.

Merchant Cash Advance Diminished by Growth of Payment Technologies

May 15, 2011
Article by:

Technology will be the end of us all

When bank lending dried up, Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) providers fulfilled the need to keep America’s small business owners going strong. By withholding a percentage of each credit/debit card sale automatically, there was no need to worry about a client’s ability to make payments. Without the risk of late payers or non-payers, MCA providers singlehandedly eradicated credit score from the underwriting guidelines. Or so they thought.

Only a small percentage of businesses in default actually close their doors. Circumventing the MCA provider’s merchant processor or incentivizing customers to pay with cash are issues that have plagued the industry for years. While this would constitute a clear breach in the sale of one’s future receivables, it’s not always a deliberate act of malice. However, there is a direct correlation between the frequency of breaches and *surprise* declining credit score.

But in the instances without malice, such as if damaged POS equipment prevents the flow of processing, there’s not much a MCA provider can do other than help fix it. These gaps in collection affect the bottom line and lead to upward pressure on costs or tighter restrictions on approval, two outcomes that nobody wants.

And as if there already wasn’t a strain, changes in payment technology are quickly eroding the MCA industry’s turf. The credit/debit card sales of a business aren’t exactly limited to one of these:

Now there are options, lots of them. In today’s world you can accept electronic payments with almost anything, a conundrum for MCA providers aiming to collect a percentage of all of it. And how about those routine PCI compliance upgrades? There are countless businesses with a basement full of old credit card machines that could be plugged back in, put back into service, and freely used to circumvent their financial obligations.

Take this clothing retailer for example. She qualified for an advance of only $5,000 but when it came time to convert the merchant account, the process wasn’t so easy:

Nearly all of the transactions conducted inside the store happen through the touch screen POS. The merchant statements reflect consistent historical sales of nearly $4,800 per month, instilling the belief that the future won’t be much different. But when the customer lines get too long, there’s a backup credit card terminal that they pull out from under the counter that still has an active account with a previous processor. Around the holidays, they dig out the old Tranz model terminals from the basement and use them too. For street fairs and trade shows, they attach their Square to their iPhone and process on the go. And when it comes to their website and Ebay, PayPal is their preferred method of payment.

This doesn’t mean the touch screen POS won’t continue to see $4,800 worth of action per month, but the situation doesn’t inspire a lot of confidence if the goal is to collect a percentage of their credit/debit card sales. What if they occasionally use Square inside the store? What if phone orders are punched into PayPal? These things may happen inadvertently or simply because their customers demand it.

To firmly secure a purchase of future sales, the MCA provider would need to do the following:

  • Convert the touch screen POS system (which will very likely come with a fee from the POS reseller)
  • Reprogram their backup terminal
  • Reprogram all the old terminals collecting dust in the basement
  • Force the return of the Square and replace it with their own iPhone processing attachment
  • Delete PayPal from the HTML of the business’s website
  • Instruct them to stop conducting business on Ebay
  • Cancel the PayPal account altogether and replace with an authorize.net virtual interface or something equivalent

That’s a lot of effort for $5,000 but doing anything less is a gamble. That’s another reason why MCAs are more expensive than bank loans. Without set fixed payments, they are extremely vulnerable to economic ups and downs and now the explosion of payment alternatives.

Rather than stay ahead, the industry is becoming more fractured as evident by the rise of new funding sources such as Kabbage, that lends against future PayPal sales. It’s innovative but vulnerable. Kabbage depends on the success and status quo of PayPal for survival, a characteristic that is not likely to carry them far. Similarly, MCA providers are dependent on withholding a percentage of future sales, an uneasy task in a world where the point of sale itself is changing.

Innovation in the MCA space has gone as far as automated bank debits and a lockbox. One depends on the merchant’s use of a single bank account and the other is equally exposed to the issues we’ve discussed.

Which of course begs the question: If electronic payments are becoming more elusive to capture, how can the MCA industry survive? The obvious answer is to transform the product itself into a loan. Secure it against collateral and have the credit bureaus at your disposal. Breaches will become far less likely and electronic payments less elusive when there are actual consequences involved. It’s a dreaded word and one MCA representatives have spent years avoiding, but according to the state of California, it’s probably a loan already anyway.

As MCA providers struggle to keep up with payment alternatives, banks are wondering when we’ll all wake up from the “it’s not a loan” euphoria. If the goal is to provide capital and get more back, reprogramming a terminal isn’t going to cut it. How many free hours can America Online offer to bring people back to their dialup internet service? Technology changed and the age of AOL ended. So too may the age of Merchant Cash Advance…. at least in its current form.

– The Merchant Cash Advance Resource

http://www.merchantcashadvanceresource.com

Complete Merchant Cash Advance Industry Statistics 2010

January 9, 2011
Article by:

We have gathered data on all 50 states and the District of Columbia and put together the most comprehensive statistics for the Merchant Cash Advance Industry in 2010!!!


What is a Merchant Cash Advance?


Where was this data pulled from?

Figures were obtained partially by counting the number of UCC filings with many Secretary of State Databases. We complemented this with statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Labor, U.S. Census, and a little bit of intuition. 


Are these figures exact?

No. These are not exact figures and our results should not be used as a basis for any financial decision. These are very good estimates based on real data. We are not responsible if this information is misused, nor are we responsible for any damages as a result of this information’s publication. For liability purposes, these figures should be considered purely the opinion of this site’s authors.

Was the data manipulated to put some firms in favorable or less favorable light?

No. This site seeks to be an independent, unbiased community for the Merchant Cash Advance industry. The numbers are what they are.


Was any personal, secretive, or confidential information obtained?

No. No Merchant Cash Advance provider or business owner had any personal or private information at risk. All data was obtained legally and all data is already of the public record.

I have purchased UCC Secured Party marketing lists and there are hundreds of Secured Party names that you don’t seem to have listed on your site. Are you missing a whole chunk of the market?

For the purposes of this study, we purchased some of these lists ourselves. We found that most of the secured parties listed on there were not actually MCA providers. Though they carried names that incuded the terms ‘capital’, ‘advance’, ‘funding’, a lot of them were firms that actually engaged in invoice factoring, A/R factoring, advances on lottery winnings, loans, and leasing. If you’re convinced otherwise, you can submit any secured party names to us by e-mail at webmaster@merchantprocessingresource.com


I clicked on a state and the total number of UCC Filings does not equal the total of the firms you broke down. How come?

We realize that some firms do not record transactions with a UCC filing or file under a name that we have not discovered. The hard data is broken down, but the total for the state is a result of further analysis.

Are Merchant Cash Advance providers that fund a lot of businesses better than the ones that only fund a few?

Not at all and our rankings should be not perceived that way! Every provider should be judged on their own merit. Some firms choose to be small. The amount of businesses funded per year or per state do not in any way indicate the quality of the deal or the business’s experience. Think Bank of America (Millions of Customers) or a small town community bank (hundreds of customers). Business owners should do their own due diligence.

I am a Manger at or Partner at a Merchant Cash Advance firm that is ranked in these statistics. The figures you have are wrong and I want to submit our actual figures /  I want you delete our company name from this publication.

Managers and Merchant Cash Advance firm owners can reach us at webmaster@merchantprocessingesource.com. Keep in mind these results were put together from data that is already public and accessible. Our site receives hudreds of visits a day(and we’re still fairly new), therefore we are increasing your firm’s exposure. We are an advocate of the Merchant Cash Advance financial product and believe any Direct Funder benefits from their information here.

=============================

MERCHANT CASH ADVANCE STATISTICS 2010

Funded Amount Assumes Average Merchant Cash Advance Deal is $25,000



State # of MCA Deals Dollars Funded
Arizona 369 $9,225,000
Colorado 503 $12,575,000
Hawaii 53 $1,325,000
Ohio 524 $13,100,000
Oregon 237 $5,925,000
Rhode Island 91 $2,275,000
Georgia 716 $17,900,000
New York 1,273 $31,825,000
Washington 355 $8,875,000
Texas 1,634 $40,850,000
California 2,768 $69,200,000
Alabama 311 $7,775,000
Alaska 46 $1,150,000
Arkansas 199 $4,975,000
Connecticut 218 $5,450,000
Delaware 56 $1,400,000
Washington D.C. 19 $475,000
Florida 1,522 $38,050,000
Idaho 135 $3,375,000
Illinois 769 $19,225,000
Indiana 440 $11,000,000
Iowa 254 $6,350,000
Kansas 218 $5,450,000
Kentucky 311 $7,775,000
Louisiana 256 $6,400,000
Maine 108 $2,700,000
Maryland 362 $9,050,000
Massachusetts 349 $8,725,000
Michigan 650 $16,250,000
Minnesota 425 $10,625,000
Mississippi 180 $4,500,000
Missouri 425 $10,625,000
Montana 93 $2,325,000
Nebraska 152 $3,800,000
Nevada 170 $4,250,000
New Hampshire 99 $2,475,000
New Jersey 527 $13,175,000
New Mexico 124 $3,100,000
North Carolina 613 $15,325,000
North Dakota 62 $1,550,000
Oklahoma 274 $6,850,000
Pennsylvania 895 $22,375,000
South Carolina 303 $7,575,000
South Dakota 80 $2,000,000
Tennessee 466 $11,650,000
Utah 220 $5,500,000
Vermont 52 $1,300,000
Virginia 457 $11,425,000
West Virginia 311 $2,975,000
Wisconsin 434 $10,850,000
Wyoming 49 $1,225,000
TOTALS 20,966 $524,160,355

 

There were approximately 21,000 Merchant Cash Advance transactions in 2010 for a total of over $500 Million Funded. For the first 11 states listed at the top, you can click the link to view a detailed breakdown by funding provider. The market share percentage stays relatively consistent state to state and therefore we only felt it necessary to include data for 11 states. It should be noted that those states make up 41% of the national population.

For previously released data on the business types most commonly funded, click here.

 

=============================

NOTE: This study and the results remain the solely owned work of www.merchantprocessingresource.com

If you wish to refer to any data described here for an article or advertisement, you may do so by acknowledging the source and including a link to our site.

The Merchant Cash Advance Resource

Want to comment? Sign up for a FREE webs.com account. It takes 2 seconds.