From Small to Big: Why Funding Circle is Building its Intermediary Channel
April 21, 2016
If online lenders want to disrupt banking, they need bankers.
Small business marketplace lender Funding Circle hired an intermediary finance veteran Neil Mullane to expand the company’s reach among small merchants. Mullane comes with eight years of experience in commercial finance at Barclays, where he oversaw business and corporate banking working with small businesses with a £250,000 to £25 million turnover.
The London-based P2P lender has channeled more than $2 billion of loans from individual and institutional investors to businesses in the U.S., U.K. and Europe since 2010 and has said that it remains dedicated to two principles, “marketplace and small business.”
And its gaze is set on Europe. Last year, it acquired German marketplace lender Zencap for an immediate footprint in Germany, Spain and Netherlands. Additionally, its SME Income Fund that was listed on the London Stock Exchange in November 2015, raised £150 million from shareholders and started lending to small businesses in those markets last month.
Last week (April 14), the company also launched UK’s first P2P securitized ABS backed by loans worth £130 million.
Speaking at LendIt USA recently, the company’s US co-founder and managing director Sam Hodges envisioned the golden age for marketplace lending where it takes “seconds to issue credit,” from a broad network of global investors. “A loan should get funded by a network of investors all over the world — be it a pensioner in London, a hedge fund manager in Sydney or a family office in New York simultaneously putting money to work through a global platform,” he said.
He elaborated further to note that the industry will have to work on four key tenets to get there: Stable lending capital, taking controlled risks, maintaining operational discipline to make sure that unit economics favor scaling and lastly, maintaining integrity around infrastructure and transparency.
The company has noted its intention to move in this direction at least with hiring the right talent, whether through the former Executive Board Member of the European Central Bank (ECB), Jörg Asmussen Mullane to lead business development or beefing up its risk compliance and product engineering teams in San Francisco.
SoFi Hedge Fund was Not Created for Capital, says CEO Mike Cagney
April 19, 2016If you were at LendIt then you might nod at this — the echo from the alternative lending industry congregation last week had just three words: Long term capital.
Nearly 3500 industry folks gathered at San Francisco to share woes and celebrate victories.
“The nonbank lending industry is at an inflection point,” said Mike Cagney, CEO of SoFi. Cagney known for his candor warned that for the business to make a leapfrog, companies need to establish more balance sheet partnerships, preferably with banks. A failure to do so would cap the number of originations.
“What banks really like is for the alt lenders to be the infrastructure/origination framework and for them to be the balance sheets. But the problem occurs when they also want to retain the customer, this is going to dictate the direction of the industry because you will get a natural cap and you won’t be able to go more than a billion and half originations a month without having balance sheet partnerships.”
In house capital? Not really
Cagney doesn’t want to give the impression that its newly launched hedge fund came about because it couldn’t sell enough loans. It’s rather to gain more access to retail investors and this he said was a simpler vehicle than participating in equity and securitization.
“We have half a billion dollars going into the hedge fund and that’s a week’s production for us. So that’s not going to solve the funding problem.”
We’re not skirting regulation
“It’s a misconception that our industry exists because of some regulatory arbitrage,” Cagney said reasoning that the industry has to follow the same lending regulations as a bank.
“There are lot of limitations that we have because we are not a bank holding company.”
Who are we? Not Banks. What do we want? National lending licenses
Cagney championed the cause for a national lending license and said that Dodd Frank falls short by limiting the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
“The OCC was the mechanism to get a national lending license without the deposit insurance and the industry needs that back.”
It’s Too Late to Start Building an Online Lending Platform, OnDeck’s CEO Suggests
April 16, 2016
If you’re looking to enter the online lending market, you really only have three choices, said OnDeck CEO Noah Breslow, build, buy or partner.
At Lendit, Breslow admitted that OnDeck’s original concept back in 2007 was to create a small business lending platform for banks. Unfortunately they weren’t ready for online lending at that time, he told the crowd. He referred to the 2007-2010 era as the “low awareness” phase of online lending which was followed by the “skepticism” phase. Today, the industry is in stampede mode, he said.
Because of that, it’s probably too late to build a platform he suggested.
“What’s really unique about online lending is okay, let’s say you’ve built something and then you want to bring it live, you still have to lend and learn. You can’t deploy a billion dollars on day one. So once the technology is live you have to create vintages of loans that perform, refine your credit models, and so when are you going to be at scale in that business? It might actually take you several years to execute the build and then to scale up your actual loan volume.”
And while the merits of buying an existing platform might seem obvious, it’s not always so easy.
“On the buy side, clearly it’s expensive as well. There’s integration risk and maybe there’s pros in that you get more control over these platforms, but we haven’t seen any of that really happen at this point, and I think the expense of it is a major reason why. Which leaves you with partnering.”
Breslow added in regards to partnering, “that’s what we think to be the dominant form of collaboration”
Watch his full Lendit speech below:
Direct Mail Still Very Effective, Says National Funding President Torrie Inouye
April 16, 2016
When I met with San Diego-based National Funding President Torrie Inouye at Lendit, I was surprised to learn that the company had quietly funded $293 million to small businesses in 2015, enough to earn them a spot on AltFinanceDaily’s top 10 alternative business funder list. The company isn’t new. They were founded in 1999, which puts them in the same category as CAN Capital, a 90s era relic that has not only survived but has continued to evolve and quite literally be a leader of the pack.
Inouye graduated from Stanford University in 2001 with a BA in Economics and started at National in 2004 where she worked as a Corporate Strategy Analyst. After 3 and a half years, she went on to play key roles at Union Bank and Intuit before returning back to National in the Fall of 2014. With a strong background in data analytics, Inouye took over as the company’s president just last week. Dave Gilbert, the company’s founder, has been the CEO since the beginning.
“Dave has always understood that data is valuable,” Inouye said, adding that she had been tasked with harvesting it.
“One of the trends that we’re seeing in our data is our direct mail response rates being much higher than what other people might expect,” she said. “We’re still surprising really good at direct mail.”
Others within the alternative lending space have made similar assertions, which ironically kind of undermines the concept of online lending itself. For Inouye, she says the online part is “the product.”
“You can control the message and you can control who you’re talking to with direct mail,” she explained. Though in a way the offline tactic is driving people to engage online. “A lot of our direct mail response comes through our website,” she said.
An expanded version of our interview will appear in AltFinanceDaily’s May/June 2016 edition scheduled to come out in early June. Subscribe FREE here.
Square Capital’s Jackie Reses Reveals Why They Really Gave Up Merchant Cash Advances
April 14, 2016
At Lendit, Bloomberg Reporter Emily Chang asked Square Capital head Jacqueline Reses to explain the real reason behind Square’s shift from merchant cash advances to loans.
Reses said that it was not a customer issue, but an investor one. “This industry and this conference more than anyone understands the nuance between MCAs and loans,” she said. “From an investor side, that’s really where the savings are between the form of an MCA and the form of a loan, in that there’s an actual repayment date.”
Reading between the lines, she seemed to be saying that investors like certainty and exact terms whereas the traditional merchant cash advance product was harder to sell off or securitize because they lack a defined element of time.
Fast loan approvals shouldn’t be criminalized
Referring to the criticism that online lenders have been getting recently for their fast approvals, Chang specifically asked if companies like OnDeck were approving loans too quickly.
Reses responded, “I don’t think the ability to execute something quickly, smoothly, transparently, should be criminalized as something that requires oversight, and so I think being good at something should be well regarded.” She later added, “I think the notion that credit decisions being swift is a problem is just misguided.”
Transparency
Reses used the word “transparency” several times but in explaining such did not reference the disclosure of Annual Percentage Rates even once. Instead she mentioned the importance of spelling out the total dollar cost to the merchants, subtly reconfirming the findings that are coming from many other alternative lenders.
Was the move from MCA just about investors though?
Read our initial assessment and expanded theory.
Watch the full “fireside chat” video below:
Funding Circle Still Focused on “Marketplace” and Small Business
April 13, 2016
At Lendit, AltFinanceDaily asked Funding Circle co-founder and US market head Sam Hodges if the company’s domestic loan volume would eventually outpace originations in the UK. Hodges expressed optimism that it would and explained that the company’s UK origins had simply given that operation a 12-24 month head start.
The company has originated more than $2 billion in loans since inception. A page on their UK site specifies that 1,212,223,380 pounds have gone to british businesses, the equivalent of about $1.7 billion.
Asked if the company would branch out into other types of lending such as consumer, Hodges responded that the company remains dedicated to two principles, “marketplace and small business.” On that note however, he said their UK branch already engages in commercial property loans and didn’t rule out that such a product could eventually be made available in the US.
Why Marketplace Lending Euphoria Has Really Ended – It Was Lust not Love
April 13, 2016
“The honeymoon is over,” said Peter Renton at Lendit. He was speaking in reference to the media’s shifting coverage of marketplace lending. Some professionals throughout the conference said the excitement had faded because venture capitalists had already gotten their fill or that there was economic uncertainty or that assets could potentially underperform.
Fitch for example, attributes the euphoria-ending reality check to a lack of available data to support sustainability throughout credit cycles, in addition to regulatory interest.
Those theories aren’t wrong, there’s just not much new about them. These same concerns were raised at length two years ago.
Here’s why the euphoria has really ended:
The unknowns are now known
Two years ago, investors wanted to know who you were, what you did, and how you did it. They wanted to know if it was legal, what you valued yourself at, and how big you thought the market was for that product or service. To investors, these fintech startups were both mysterious and seductive. They were changing the world, uberizing lending, disrupting banking, and showing huge potential for scale. One might say, it was euphoria-inducing.
Calling what happened next a honeymoon implies that there was a marriage. Instead, investors became lust-fueled suitors chasing after The It Girl, confusing their infatuation for real romantic feelings. But like all relationships that start out this way, the investors freaked when their marketplace lender partners admitted they were looking for something long term.
Baby, you know I like you but we haven’t even been through a full credit cycle yet
Marketplace lenders started to talk about marriage, a honeymoon, kids, and heck even moving out to the suburbs to launch a brick and mortar location to complement their online businesses. Maybe they’d even one day accept deposits and become banks themselves.
It’s the kind of talk that can cause an investor to rethink everything.
OMG, are these companies all just banks? Should we be valuing them as banks?!
Suddenly they’re starting to look at their partners in a whole new light. Those once cute flaws are now annoying quirks. And so it’s time to decide if they’re really the one or just another relationship that was fun while it lasted.
Dating the same people
Lending Club’s CEO Renaud Laplanche has been a keynote speaker at Lendit for four years in a row. His company originates more than $8 billion a year in loans. What they do, how they do it, and how much it’s worth, is all disclosed in their quarterly earnings reports.
There’s Lending Club’s competitors, OnDeck, OnDeck’s competitors, SoFi, SoFi’s competitors and so on. Every little sector of marketplace lending has a benchmark. It might be bond ratings, annual origination volume, securitization appetite, public valuation, default statistics, investor base or something else. So even if an investor doesn’t know YOU, they probably know a lot about someone like you. This puts them in a position of power and thus the opportunity to play hard to get.
They still like marketplace lenders, that much was obvious by Lendit’s record attendance this year. They just might be entering a point in their lives where they want a partner they can actually take home to meet their mothers.
If that sounds serious, it’s because it is. Could there be wedding bells in the industry’s future? The real honeymoon has yet to come.
The Top 10 Alternative Small Business Funders
April 12, 2016At Lendit yesterday, I learned the 2015 origination volume of two additional small business funders that I was not able to ascertain previously. They are CA-based National Funding and GA-based Kabbage. Below is a list of the original top 8 funders that has been amended to form the top 10.
RANKINGS
| Company Name | 2015 Funding Volume | 2014 Funding Volume |
| OnDeck | $1,900,000,000 | $1,200,000,000 |
| CAN Capital | $1,500,000,000 | $1,000,000,000 |
| Funding Circle | $1,200,000,000 | $600,000,000 |
| Kabbage | $1,000,000,000 | $400,000,000 |
| PayPal Working Capital | $900,000,000 | $250,000,000 |
| Bizfi | $480,000,000 | $277,000,000 |
| Fundry (Yellowstone Capital) | $422,000,000 | $290,000,000 |
| Square Capital | $400,000,000 | $100,000,000 |
| Strategic Funding Source | $375,000,000 | $280,000,000 |
| National Funding | $293,000,000 |
An even larger list exists in the current issue of our magazine. To subscribe to future issues for free, click here.
